Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Urolithiasis +/- TCC

Sonopath Forum

Urolithiasis +/- TCC

  • 12 year old mn Bichon with hx of increased frequency of urination but no stranguria
  • U/A showed atypical cells with no bacteruria and no hematuria
  • Urinary tract US shows multiple,  gravity dependent, echogenic shadowing denisities,  multiple 0.3-0.6 focal wall massess at the bladder apex, and micropolypoid changes at the trigone
  • R/O’s are urolithisias with concurrent polyps, or neoplasia (TCC)
  • Plan is to perform cystotomy and bladder wall biopsy.  Any other thoughts?

  • 12 year old mn Bichon with hx of increased frequency of urination but no stranguria
  • U/A showed atypical cells with no bacteruria and no hematuria
  • Urinary tract US shows multiple,  gravity dependent, echogenic shadowing denisities,  multiple 0.3-0.6 focal wall massess at the bladder apex, and micropolypoid changes at the trigone
  • R/O’s are urolithisias with concurrent polyps, or neoplasia (TCC)
  • Plan is to perform cystotomy and bladder wall biopsy.  Any other thoughts?

The uroliths appear strange to me as they do not have discreet boundaries and vary in degree of echogenicity and shadowing.  Pics of dog in a standing position show echogenic densities at the ventral portion of the bladder, but they appear fewer in number, smaller in size, and more discreet.  Is this typical?  I could not find any dorsal wall masses with the dog standing, however, he was not a very cooperative patient at this point.

Comments

Anonymous

Melissa, the good thing is
Melissa, the good thing is that all of the polyps appear apical so may be resected with removal of 1/3 of the apical UB. Whether TCC or polypoid cystitis it can all be resected. The bad thing is the CUJ and proximal urethra looks infiltrated with likely TCC but i never confirm this without video as stills can create something from nothing. Needs traumatic catherization or scope to know for sure. The echogenic structures are mucous balls with sand…like graphite and water mixed together mixed together with overt stones in image 3 with solid shadowing. if the urethra and cuj is clean on video then the UB apical wall needs bx and culture and resection in my opinion along with stone removal. That way its in a jar and not in the dog causing or potentially causing issues. When in doubt cut it out:)

Anonymous

Melissa, the good thing is
Melissa, the good thing is that all of the polyps appear apical so may be resected with removal of 1/3 of the apical UB. Whether TCC or polypoid cystitis it can all be resected. The bad thing is the CUJ and proximal urethra looks infiltrated with likely TCC but i never confirm this without video as stills can create something from nothing. Needs traumatic catherization or scope to know for sure. The echogenic structures are mucous balls with sand…like graphite and water mixed together mixed together with overt stones in image 3 with solid shadowing. if the urethra and cuj is clean on video then the UB apical wall needs bx and culture and resection in my opinion along with stone removal. That way its in a jar and not in the dog causing or potentially causing issues. When in doubt cut it out:)

Anonymous

Thanks Eric!
Thanks Eric!

Anonymous

Thanks Eric!
Thanks Eric!