We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
6 years old cat, M/N with a chronic history of decrease apettite, vomiting on and off, very thin
BW was wnl.
AUS : mild mineralization on both kidneys, no pelvic dilation, mild thickening of the stomach wall – 0.48 cm
To me it looks like pyloric intussusception- non obstructive .
Do you agree?
Comments
Im seeing normal single
Im seeing normal single layering and not doubled or tripled which i would expect in an intussusception.
Maybe I did not selected the
Maybe I did not selected the most representative images but to me it looks like there are to many lawyers in the pylorus, unless it’s reverberation artefact, but consistent in multiple images ?planes. Unfortunatelly from this unit I cannot upload clip as over 40 mb
I think that is just
I think that is just reverberation artifact.
Now that I look at it more I
Now that I look at it more I agree. To symetrical lines…
thank you