Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Bladder TCC and is it resectable? What is your criteria?

Sonopath Forum

Bladder TCC and is it resectable? What is your criteria?

EL on TCC resectable and non in borderline TCC case near ureter

Hello Doc, the resection is the surgeon’s call depending on abilities. My query into boarded surgeons is that most surgeons like to have at least 1cm of clean tissue between the thickening to resect and the right ureteral papilla. This is pushing that border a but. The ideal scenario would be to scope first and ensure the urethra is absolutely clean, even though seems so on ultrasound but I have seen scope see small amounts of tumor in the urethra that US can’t see. and she could be laser ablated at the same time if sent to Ridgewood and Dr. Cerf. If a surgeon goes into this scenario it may be a judgment call to transpose the ureter but I doubt this will be necessary. In our current stats in over 85 cases and 150 procedures on the UGELAB (www.sonopath.com) our numbers are > 1 year on MST for TCC with UGELAB alone but these are not yet published numbers. I am somewhat biased since I am the co-founder of the UGELAB procedure but if she were my dog and I didn’t mind travelling to Ridgewood NJ and maybe seeing Manahattan for a few days, this is the route I would go as any urethral involvement as well as mural thickening could be addressed all at once whereas sx can’t do anything caudal to the ureters.

On the other hand Sx could be done first and UGELAB later but this compromises the closed system of the urinary tract which is important to keep the tumor localized and not potentially cross into the abdomen. the UGELAB can ablate any tumor anywhere in the bladder except when it enters the ureters which is why we do everything to “keep it off the pipes.” Its the obstruction of ureters and urethra that is usually the lethal issue.

 

 

Leave a Reply