Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Doberman with CVD

Sonopath Forum

Doberman with CVD

– 9 year old FS Doberman (approx 100lbs) presented to rDVM due to 3 day history of night time coughing; new grade 3/6 systolic heart murmur

– chest rads consistent with CHF; ECG tachycardia with no arrhythmias seen

– Echo was a little unusual  on m-mode as the IVS was contracting well and the PW was not

– I took several LV m-mode measurments and FS% ranged from 11%-21% (could not get a consistent reading)

– 2-D LV  FS% measurement calculation was 21% (too high for DCM and CHF) – so more likely CVD

– 9 year old FS Doberman (approx 100lbs) presented to rDVM due to 3 day history of night time coughing; new grade 3/6 systolic heart murmur

– chest rads consistent with CHF; ECG tachycardia with no arrhythmias seen

– Echo was a little unusual  on m-mode as the IVS was contracting well and the PW was not

– I took several LV m-mode measurments and FS% ranged from 11%-21% (could not get a consistent reading)

– 2-D LV  FS% measurement calculation was 21% (too high for DCM and CHF) – so more likely CVD

– there was a mild MR with a slightly eccentric jet; EPSS was slightly elevated at about 1.0cm; severe LAE; aorta and pul max vel wnl

– the pet has been started on pimo and furosemide with an ace-inhibitor to come once stable

What are you thoughts on this echo and the unusual LV wall contraction pattern on m-mode?

Comments

EL

Im having a tough time seeing

Im having a tough time seeing 20% FS% as the free wall isnt moving thought the septum is sort of moving…. 15%-ish at best… You didnt post an epss but eyeballing im seeing an epss of about 1.2 (normal < 0.8 cm). This is key because MR with myocardial insufficiency has a wnl epss whereas oinly DCM and DCM-like myocarditis will elevate the epss. That being said the MV is vegetative….Regardless what you call it this dobie is in left CHF.

I would consider myocarditis but more likely dcm and the mv happens to be vegetative but tx dcm and see what happens.. check thyroid and systemic disease as well.

Triple tx lasix ace-i pimobendan and neutraceuticals if you like them and recheck in 10-14 days. If th epss normalizes then not dcm but if it stays elevated > 0.8 cm in proper position then it is dcm… any this is a rule I’ve always lived by on myocardial insufficiency secondary to chronic mvd vs DCM.

EL

Im having a tough time seeing

Im having a tough time seeing 20% FS% as the free wall isnt moving thought the septum is sort of moving…. 15%-ish at best… You didnt post an epss but eyeballing im seeing an epss of about 1.2 (normal < 0.8 cm). This is key because MR with myocardial insufficiency has a wnl epss whereas oinly DCM and DCM-like myocarditis will elevate the epss. That being said the MV is vegetative….Regardless what you call it this dobie is in left CHF.

I would consider myocarditis but more likely dcm and the mv happens to be vegetative but tx dcm and see what happens.. check thyroid and systemic disease as well.

Triple tx lasix ace-i pimobendan and neutraceuticals if you like them and recheck in 10-14 days. If th epss normalizes then not dcm but if it stays elevated > 0.8 cm in proper position then it is dcm… any this is a rule I’ve always lived by on myocardial insufficiency secondary to chronic mvd vs DCM.

Pankatz

Thanks EL for your thoughts.

Thanks EL for your thoughts. I got an EPSS measuremwnt of about 1.0cm. Regardless of the diagnosis I guess treatment is pretty much the same at this stage. Just does not appear to be a classic case for either DCM or CVD. Maybe this poor Dobie has a degree of both?

Pankatz

Thanks EL for your thoughts.

Thanks EL for your thoughts. I got an EPSS measuremwnt of about 1.0cm. Regardless of the diagnosis I guess treatment is pretty much the same at this stage. Just does not appear to be a classic case for either DCM or CVD. Maybe this poor Dobie has a degree of both?

EL

Could be both but consider

Could be both but consider infectious in a non MVD breed with mv vegetation. Once you treat wiht triple tx and reevaluate see what the epss does… stays > 0.8 then dcm if it doesn’t and normalizes then MVD and myocardial insufficiency.

That being said there are lots of DCM – like presentations out there that don’t follow the rules especially in Labradors in my experience… as one of my mentors always said just describe out what you see and tx what you see and leave the dx a bit vague especially with the heart as the presentation may change.. like a UCM cat in failure after tx and stabilization then may meet HCM criteria…

The heart changes all the time under many influences as an effector organ… what I see the Cardiologists I respect the most doing is less labeling of a presentation and just describing out more as they get and respect this concept of dynamic change… they tend to be the more politically correct ones as well on second opinion.

With a weak heart always always look for systemic disease that may not be the cause of FS% differences but may be making it worse… Thyroid, infectious, abdominal disease of all types even cns disease.. and of course systemic hypertension that gets missed often.

EL

Could be both but consider

Could be both but consider infectious in a non MVD breed with mv vegetation. Once you treat wiht triple tx and reevaluate see what the epss does… stays > 0.8 then dcm if it doesn’t and normalizes then MVD and myocardial insufficiency.

That being said there are lots of DCM – like presentations out there that don’t follow the rules especially in Labradors in my experience… as one of my mentors always said just describe out what you see and tx what you see and leave the dx a bit vague especially with the heart as the presentation may change.. like a UCM cat in failure after tx and stabilization then may meet HCM criteria…

The heart changes all the time under many influences as an effector organ… what I see the Cardiologists I respect the most doing is less labeling of a presentation and just describing out more as they get and respect this concept of dynamic change… they tend to be the more politically correct ones as well on second opinion.

With a weak heart always always look for systemic disease that may not be the cause of FS% differences but may be making it worse… Thyroid, infectious, abdominal disease of all types even cns disease.. and of course systemic hypertension that gets missed often.

Pankatz

Good advice!

Good advice!

Pankatz

Good advice!

Good advice!