CMO is the most probable diagnosis for me based on the demographics & Hx even though typical radiographic changes are lacking. The rad findings are very likely technical except for the ST swelling.
Yes not positional though it is likely that the decreased opacity is technical and there may be some bilaterally symmetric new bone formation which would fit CMO (even though location is somewhat atypical) as well. but thats just my 2cents
Comments
CMO is the most probable
CMO is the most probable diagnosis for me based on the demographics & Hx even though typical radiographic changes are lacking. The rad findings are very likely technical except for the ST swelling.
Are you saying there aren’t
Are you saying there aren’t significant radiological changes, just positional? (besides the soft tissue swelling?)
Are you saying there aren’t
Are you saying there aren’t significant radiological changes, just positional? (besides the soft tissue swelling?)
Yes not positional though it
Yes not positional though it is likely that the decreased opacity is technical and there may be some bilaterally symmetric new bone formation which would fit CMO (even though location is somewhat atypical) as well. but thats just my 2cents
Thank you for your help.
Thank you for your help.