Initial echo: The right atrium was severely enlarged in this patient, measuring 3.0 cm in width. The left atrial size was normal to subnormal at 0.8 cm. The left atrial and left ventricular volumes were normal to subnormal with a large ventricular septal defect noted at the membranous septum, causing volume overload in the right heart. Trivial mitral insufficiency noted yet not clinically significant. Secondary tricuspid insufficiency noted with severe right atrial enlargement. The bi-directional flow noted in the ventricular septal defect is indicative of Eisenmanger’s physiology or reversal of flow, owing to equivalent pressures in the right and left heart. Right ventricular hypertrophy noted. Mild increased pulmonic outflow velocity noted, considered compensatory. No pericardial or pleural effusion noted.
At 4-month recheck echo: The left atrium is normal to slightly volume underloaded. The right atrium is markedly enlarged; no obvious smoke. The right ventricle is mildly enlarged with mild RV hypertrophy; however, the systolic function is subjectively intact. Mild central tricuspid regurgitation. Flow through the RVOT is borderline elevated. A VSD is unable to be visualized on 2D imaging. An abnormal jet is seen entering the mid-RV however, consistent with this previous diagnosis. Trivial pericardial effusion. Moderate volume pleural effusion and ascites is seen with hepatic congestion. No obvious cardiac tumors.
At follow up echo 8 months from initial ultrasound: Subjective mild reduced LV volume is present. Marked right atrial enlargement (measuring 3.6 cm diameter) with concurrent right ventricular enlargement exhibiting potential evidence of mild right ventricle concentric hypertrophy was noted. Moderate volume pleural effusion was present. An unspecified spherical non-homogeneous mass lesion was noted adjacent to the heart measuring approximately 3.7 cm in diameter. Brief sonographic assessment of the liver revealed subjective caudal vena cava and hepatic vein dilation suggestive of emerging congestive criteria.
These findings are compatible with an extensive infiltrative process with differentials including hepatocutaneous syndrome, neoplasia such as hepatocellular carcinoma, extensive nodular hyperplasia or fibrosis associated with a chronic inflammatory process. Cirrhosis is considered less likely, given the suspected normal to increased volume of the liver.
None as clinical and sonographic presentations evaluated by the dermatologist consistent with hepatocutaneous syndrome. Owner did not permit sampling of the liver.