Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Is a HCM phenotype diagnosis warranted?

Sonopath Forum

Is a HCM phenotype diagnosis warranted?

Provided are some pics of an 8kg, 11 year old female spayed DMH presented for ultrasound. Pre-surgical blood work revealed a blood glucose of 15.1 with normal renal values. ECG suggested widening of the QRS complex and right axis deviation possibly normal variation. A SNAP pro BNP was abnormal. A thyroid test was not performed. Sedated with Gabapentin and given butorphanol IV prior to the study (mildly effective).Imaging was fair. NIBP was 145/119mmHg with a MAP of 125. The LAD measured 15.4mm -16.5mm. No abnormal flow was noted. Doppler E’ of 6.1cm/s noted at the free wall annulus. Sorry for the poor video! Your thoughts on this case.

Comments

Eric Lindquist

Looks very normal to me Dan. I don’t use the hcm phenotype til I have a solid ivsd or pwd of 0.6 cm and maybe even more if a big main coon as I think 0.6 is likely normal for large breed cats. Then I will emphasize it more if I have other things that suggest HCM like dynamic or fixed obstruction, sectorial hypertrophy (even if < 0.6 cm), infarcts, remodeling, MR, LAE and such. ECGs are highly variable and often non specific so I would rely on the echo for any pathology and yours looks very normal here. I have no issue with anesthesia on this heart

Dan lynn

Thanks! There was subjective hypertrophy of a papillary muscle and a couple long axis 2D LPW measures were in the grey zone but nothing more than that. I think the ECG, abnormal SNAP and Pulsed TD made me feel I had to be missing something?

Leave a Reply